Letters From the Creative Bureaucrat, continued
I write a monthly column in Northern Arizona's arts and news monthly publication, The Noise. My column is called "Letters from the Creative Bureaucrat." Here follows "part two" of the March issue column... Click here for "part one." And be sure to pick thee up a copy of this month's Noise, will ya?
~continued from earlier...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca28e/ca28e62980ae0c4ee11dba7f70477bde5d78b91a" alt=""
The more I explore this thought, the more I’m convinced that what I’m seeking is a moving target. As soon as a point of criteria becomes clear, I’m sure an artist’s work will present itself which challenges us to move that criteria. Last month, I wrote, “Rejection is in the eye of the beholder.” Maybe I should have just started there with “excellence” and avoided this column altogether.
Oh, and I never got back to the “what is art?” question. I danced around it like a boxer who fears his opponent. I suppose if I were a better writer, I’d give you some neatly wrapped article that circled around and met the question I posed at the beginning with some kind of insightful and revealing finish. Did you really expect that, after I invoked Andy Kaufman? Ha!
Cheers,
JT
Labels: Andy Kaufman, art, Viola Awards
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Talk with us, post your comment!
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home